When we queried the original manufacturer, they would point to the fact that they had tested their product on the original ONVIF 1.x tool. When I was with a previous employer, we would regularly test cameras that were declared "ONVIF Compliant" by various OEM/ODM manufacturers, and they would regularly fail internal testing. If the market is tolerating that then the market's broken. Sure, vendors who lie on their web sites are doing bad things. Nobody goes to TCP/IP interop events any more, it just works because people have figured it out. The theory is that at some point the population of functioning interoperable implementations makes this whole game irrelevant. And it doesn't seem to correlate to how big a fish you are in the Onvif fishpond.
#Milesight vms lite password download#
As it is, you can download the open source device manager and puzzle over it's response vs. It should be possible to pick up two random implementations and connect them. If Exaq has to list vendors it's done Onvif with, it still isn't fully baked.
Imagine a world where you drive up to the gas pump and have to look up your make/model/year/configuration of car to figure out if the pump will connect to your car. I care if the implementation works reliable.
I really don't care if somebody bought legal rights to flash an icon. You think you could say "Go talk to the camera guy", but unless the camera guy is selling a new camera, he's not that excited to help.Īre you Onvif Compliant if you stream Video but not audio? Or you have implemented on 2 camera motion detections instead of 6? Well, according to Onvif you are, or the manufacturer of the camera can slap on the logo and say it is.Īs a salesperson, we want this to work and we're not saying anything to get the sale, but Onvif has created the custom Codec issue all over again. We often hear "You told me it would work" and 90% of the time it does, however, each customer is different and has different uses for their cameras, creating issues for the VMS companies. What about motion based events, or audio? Some companies may or may not complete all the items within a certain version. Getting video to stream is a small portion of compatibility. They tell me I have some Axis, I have some Sony and Samsung.
Often times, I take the information provided to me from authorized dealers to put together quotes for them. When we look to see what cameras are installed we need to take careful notes of the camera manufacturer. I work for a VMS company and we routinely take over systems of others. The issue I have with Onvif is not the lying about being compliant, which is still a major issue, but the camera manufacturers saying they are 2.0 or 2.2 or Profile "S" compatible and only being a subset.
0 kommentar(er)
